ZAPALOBACO JABEQUE OF REVIEWS: THE ARMED CHALUPAS
saw two armed boats played on ANCRE planes, one of Carlos V and one of Jose Collado. Choosing between them is a classic example of Buridan's Ass: inability of choice.
The two were very similar technical and aesthetic kept not too far apart. Both were in cherry and the biggest difference was that the aesthetics of Charles V had seen and brass barrel of blued iron Jose Collado. Both were both voted with discretion, curiously did not get great ratings. I think either could have been placed at a table in Saint Malo and had no tune.
The Jose Collado had worked much detail as practicable banks stern and no doubt the turning barrel and blued iron with care was extraordinary. However, Charles V, in my opinion, had kept most minute detail, for example the famous spiked to ear. From a purely subjective point of view perhaps more aesthetically filled me of Charles V, but this view is highly unreliable. Both were very complementary. They were voted
bit, which comes for a reason both Joaquin where the booths are not like them, I share plenamente.El assertion only regret that I can do both is not were lined: I think these boats will win a lot on that tree and trees is a job "child" at that point in which they are ... I certainly hope that some ignore me and the trees in the manner of America Barceló English chalupas
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Thursday, November 8, 2007
Haru Wo Daiteita V14-youko Nitta Eng
8S COMMENTS: The STMA. Curro TRINIDAD 8S
With Curro always the feeling that I have played in a different league. And I think that is true. The boats and the things that brings Curro are another matter. While the other models do, Curro makes dioramas and the problem is that a model brings, it brings a piece of diorama and that makes aparte.El play last year brought a diorama of the Battle of Gettysburg which is still speaking. I had to do anything with the model boat so it was not voted on, but I'm sure you have voted had been very algo.Este year brought the Holy Trinity unfinished. The ship strikes by the size and I guess you where in the diorama is based and should be impressive. He received no votes because it was clear he was something else, a piece of a puzzle mayor.Si judge him as an isolated model - which I think inappropriate and unfair - you can move some things, I personally, stern I think some "delicate" but I fully understand that what is planned to turn the boat may be worth. I think it's premature to trial on this model. Only you can judge within the diorama, or, in any case, when more advanced.
With Curro always the feeling that I have played in a different league. And I think that is true. The boats and the things that brings Curro are another matter. While the other models do, Curro makes dioramas and the problem is that a model brings, it brings a piece of diorama and that makes aparte.El play last year brought a diorama of the Battle of Gettysburg which is still speaking. I had to do anything with the model boat so it was not voted on, but I'm sure you have voted had been very algo.Este year brought the Holy Trinity unfinished. The ship strikes by the size and I guess you where in the diorama is based and should be impressive. He received no votes because it was clear he was something else, a piece of a puzzle mayor.Si judge him as an isolated model - which I think inappropriate and unfair - you can move some things, I personally, stern I think some "delicate" but I fully understand that what is planned to turn the boat may be worth. I think it's premature to trial on this model. Only you can judge within the diorama, or, in any case, when more advanced.
Wednesday, November 7, 2007
Snoop Dogg Blue Jacket
COMMENTS: MODELS OF LUIS QUINTANA
In the days leading up to 8S Luis Quintana was one of the most interested in getting opinions valuation of your boat, so it seems fair that after my model, other than its own early on to make some personal reflections .
Luis Quintana always thought it was going to take the tape from 8S'07. Obviously I was wrong by much since, but won votes, their numbers were far away from the fight for first place.
presented two boats (barges), which initially had everything to gain: they were beautiful, large, very well done, rare, worthwhile and finished or almost (the finish Seekadett Victory almost finished and the hull), however, did not.
It is very difficult to give an objective on these ships: I like almost everything. Of the things I dislike most are subjective, that is, but my tastes are model errors, for example, no thrill me so painted models (but this is a hobby of mine), I get excited as large models (but this too is an oddity of mine), I prefer wooded models (but this is also a preference of mine), I get excited RC models (but this also is a quirk of mine) ... so all this is worthless.
I have to dig, dig emphasize things more or less objective I thought when I saw live upgradeable models.
With respect to Victory:
I liked the open ends of the ports, I noticed something the "clubs" in relation to the overall level of completion of the model.
the guns, although they are very well resolved, I think black oxide brass would have been aesthetically superior. I see the rope used
very white.
A general tone too "sterile", but this is very subjective ... I repeat. This maybe I can achieve it, for example, tying of the guns would ask some argued that maybe a little more attractive ... but I insist on the subjectivity. Ultimately
four jets and I'm not convinced. Regarding the Seekadett
:
here if I find 1 (one) thing that I like and are the seats of the deckhouse. Those green seats that are not material are made but they convey a sense of "plasticazo" which clashes with the sublime quality of the model. I think it hurt much to the model.
said, these questionable claims do not warrant that the boats did not obtain more votes.
In line with this thinking I do other individuals. I think
Luis models were unfairly (in my opinion unfairly) punished by ... good. You know that I am not knowledgeable in kits, kits do not, but I am lenient with the kits, so it seems a valid option like any other. Not being very knowledgeable, obvious that Luis kits were good swarmed bountiful with the view that "clear, with a kit as well ... makes a good boat." I do not agree at all with this assertion, first because, at the end of the course, what matters is to bring a good model out of which comes second, the assertion is false: a good kit can be an unfortunate boat and vice versa , with a deplorable kit (most use) can make a great model. I believe that here was not voted the most liked model but slipped a moral approach, that model had more merit. If you follow this line strictly a flat always win against a kit and always will win a one-armed, even involving a blind ...
Another consideration is the barrier between the RC and static. Here I disagree with Joaquin that the differences are narrowing, I think they are two very different worlds and that enough time will be difficult for a RC wins the 8S, just when they are out of the water like less because they have to make sacrifices important aesthetic to navigation. We will see when finished bring the magnificent Victor Rias Bajas, breaking the trend.
In the days leading up to 8S Luis Quintana was one of the most interested in getting opinions valuation of your boat, so it seems fair that after my model, other than its own early on to make some personal reflections .
Luis Quintana always thought it was going to take the tape from 8S'07. Obviously I was wrong by much since, but won votes, their numbers were far away from the fight for first place.
presented two boats (barges), which initially had everything to gain: they were beautiful, large, very well done, rare, worthwhile and finished or almost (the finish Seekadett Victory almost finished and the hull), however, did not.
It is very difficult to give an objective on these ships: I like almost everything. Of the things I dislike most are subjective, that is, but my tastes are model errors, for example, no thrill me so painted models (but this is a hobby of mine), I get excited as large models (but this too is an oddity of mine), I prefer wooded models (but this is also a preference of mine), I get excited RC models (but this also is a quirk of mine) ... so all this is worthless.
I have to dig, dig emphasize things more or less objective I thought when I saw live upgradeable models.
With respect to Victory:
I liked the open ends of the ports, I noticed something the "clubs" in relation to the overall level of completion of the model.
the guns, although they are very well resolved, I think black oxide brass would have been aesthetically superior. I see the rope used
very white.
A general tone too "sterile", but this is very subjective ... I repeat. This maybe I can achieve it, for example, tying of the guns would ask some argued that maybe a little more attractive ... but I insist on the subjectivity. Ultimately
four jets and I'm not convinced. Regarding the Seekadett
:
here if I find 1 (one) thing that I like and are the seats of the deckhouse. Those green seats that are not material are made but they convey a sense of "plasticazo" which clashes with the sublime quality of the model. I think it hurt much to the model.
said, these questionable claims do not warrant that the boats did not obtain more votes.
In line with this thinking I do other individuals. I think
Luis models were unfairly (in my opinion unfairly) punished by ... good. You know that I am not knowledgeable in kits, kits do not, but I am lenient with the kits, so it seems a valid option like any other. Not being very knowledgeable, obvious that Luis kits were good swarmed bountiful with the view that "clear, with a kit as well ... makes a good boat." I do not agree at all with this assertion, first because, at the end of the course, what matters is to bring a good model out of which comes second, the assertion is false: a good kit can be an unfortunate boat and vice versa , with a deplorable kit (most use) can make a great model. I believe that here was not voted the most liked model but slipped a moral approach, that model had more merit. If you follow this line strictly a flat always win against a kit and always will win a one-armed, even involving a blind ...
Another consideration is the barrier between the RC and static. Here I disagree with Joaquin that the differences are narrowing, I think they are two very different worlds and that enough time will be difficult for a RC wins the 8S, just when they are out of the water like less because they have to make sacrifices important aesthetic to navigation. We will see when finished bring the magnificent Victor Rias Bajas, breaking the trend.
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Free Diy Projects Plans
8S COMMENTS: Marques del Duero
Having so recently the 8S and having been raised prior to holding so many debates on whether to introduce a rating or not etc. among them one of the assistants, Charles V, made some contributions with which I stayed. Elaborated the idea is to say "why disrupt a voting system if we have more than proven to comment forums and blogs." So what better place than my own blog to comment about what happened at the meeting and the thoughts which I raised the models presented, we will for the first, which I am very familar. Marques del Duero
THE
My boat was the third, I was surprised because I did not think would get a score so high (thanks to all the honor they did me). Do not think he would be so voted for several reasons:
is a very rare model, very rare. Ships are not well. In the line of ships of the 8S like a fly in a saucer of milk and I have seen so rare that the boats are usually not the most liked. The average model is embedded in a series of charts on turning its business modelistic wood, candles, XV at the beginning of XIX and / or living fossils boats (fishing boats with fishing no longer anyone retro yachts etc) kits, canyons with ropes, etc.. The Marquis escapes from all metal, late XIX, no commercial element, waiver of kits with pumps and seductions, little rigging, steel wire ... very rare.
On the other hand there was the fatigue effect in recent years I have been up in the soup with Hussar and the Marquis (and other things ..) so all tired.
So I did not think out big score, score if course, but in a discreet heap along with six or seven more models, hence my surprise to get "podium."
Beyond that, I also thought that my boat was that I liked best of all, but that's a purely subjective assessment and, in the depths, it happens to almost everyone present ships. That said
try to dissect my positive and negative opinions on this model, will then all others.
ME LIKE THIS MODEL.
What I like is the overall aesthetic appearance achieved. I am a devoted supporter of aesthetic program of a boat and I think this is perfectly embodied their achievement. I tried to find an older model beauty (specific and clarified: that the model appears old, made in the early twentieth or late nineteenth century, in any old or aged) and I think I got it in spades. The contrast between the wood and metal I think is very successful.
I love all the hardware in the deck. The guns, bow and in general all the machinery made in brass turning, milling and cutting-off seems to me difficult to see in current models and I think they have a proper finish.
Another aspect which will present the model is its rigging. The rig has a couple of areas I very remarkable, first standing rigging and steel wire on the other hand the motonería.
The widespread use of steel wire for standing rigging on a model of the nineteenth century seems to me a very interesting discovery, I owe to Zapalobaco I found these cables and that it had used previously in Galician galleon. In Castellón saw that many RC modelers came also using similar cables, Kallu friend put me on the track to make a stash of cables in a nearby shop. Use of this steel in the MD seems novel and successful and opens a very interesting way, almost essential in this type of models.
The motonería of this model is considered exceptional and, curiously, went largely unnoticed. All the blocks are hand-made in coral wood, with brass inlaid shield false, your cleavage is highlighted with graphite, most of them have double holes to simulate the step pulley, cold meat hooks and carabiners. I think it's difficult to find blocks of this quality at this size outside of museums (and even within non-current).
NOT LIKE THIS MODEL
Et in Arcadia ego ... As you see I'm not a treaty of modesty, we see the dark side.
The helmet is not up to the model I think is clearly improved. It has a rib which leads to a small lump that breaks the smoothness of the hull, grave sin.
I do not like the transition lines to form the spur, I fear that these lines are not resolved in a perfect manner. Put another way, the line of the hull makes a strange oddities in the transition to the ram.
Although more than one model told me that he liked, I loathe the "checkerboard" in two tones has the tin. As I explained depend on the tin foil is placed on one side or another to take a different tone. This did not appreciate it and no difference in tone between the plates. I do not like.
Another aspect that detracts from the red hue of the hull. I do not like the tone you choose (I think it should be darker) and the general appearance of the paint finish, notice that a parcel is not master.
The elements of the command post poop not satisfy me, I seem somewhat old-scale and are likely to be refined, primarily the helm and the telegraph, it suffers the same defect aft barrel revolver.
I think should have been embossed decorative wrought with more finesse. Godoy said
As well in the main yard 8S was feeling short. And it's short, but that was a considered decision and sought a longer penis would more complex subsequent management of the ship and fire the size of the urn.
I have a real phobia to bases, it seems tedious and avoid it. I think the model is hampered by poverty of the base, seen in row boat in the 8S screamed best and highest pedestal.
I think I'm something both pro and con, but basically these are the features that draw my opinion on my model.
Having so recently the 8S and having been raised prior to holding so many debates on whether to introduce a rating or not etc. among them one of the assistants, Charles V, made some contributions with which I stayed. Elaborated the idea is to say "why disrupt a voting system if we have more than proven to comment forums and blogs." So what better place than my own blog to comment about what happened at the meeting and the thoughts which I raised the models presented, we will for the first, which I am very familar. Marques del Duero
THE
My boat was the third, I was surprised because I did not think would get a score so high (thanks to all the honor they did me). Do not think he would be so voted for several reasons:
is a very rare model, very rare. Ships are not well. In the line of ships of the 8S like a fly in a saucer of milk and I have seen so rare that the boats are usually not the most liked. The average model is embedded in a series of charts on turning its business modelistic wood, candles, XV at the beginning of XIX and / or living fossils boats (fishing boats with fishing no longer anyone retro yachts etc) kits, canyons with ropes, etc.. The Marquis escapes from all metal, late XIX, no commercial element, waiver of kits with pumps and seductions, little rigging, steel wire ... very rare.
On the other hand there was the fatigue effect in recent years I have been up in the soup with Hussar and the Marquis (and other things ..) so all tired.
So I did not think out big score, score if course, but in a discreet heap along with six or seven more models, hence my surprise to get "podium."
Beyond that, I also thought that my boat was that I liked best of all, but that's a purely subjective assessment and, in the depths, it happens to almost everyone present ships. That said
try to dissect my positive and negative opinions on this model, will then all others.
ME LIKE THIS MODEL.
What I like is the overall aesthetic appearance achieved. I am a devoted supporter of aesthetic program of a boat and I think this is perfectly embodied their achievement. I tried to find an older model beauty (specific and clarified: that the model appears old, made in the early twentieth or late nineteenth century, in any old or aged) and I think I got it in spades. The contrast between the wood and metal I think is very successful.
I love all the hardware in the deck. The guns, bow and in general all the machinery made in brass turning, milling and cutting-off seems to me difficult to see in current models and I think they have a proper finish.
Another aspect which will present the model is its rigging. The rig has a couple of areas I very remarkable, first standing rigging and steel wire on the other hand the motonería.
The widespread use of steel wire for standing rigging on a model of the nineteenth century seems to me a very interesting discovery, I owe to Zapalobaco I found these cables and that it had used previously in Galician galleon. In Castellón saw that many RC modelers came also using similar cables, Kallu friend put me on the track to make a stash of cables in a nearby shop. Use of this steel in the MD seems novel and successful and opens a very interesting way, almost essential in this type of models.
The motonería of this model is considered exceptional and, curiously, went largely unnoticed. All the blocks are hand-made in coral wood, with brass inlaid shield false, your cleavage is highlighted with graphite, most of them have double holes to simulate the step pulley, cold meat hooks and carabiners. I think it's difficult to find blocks of this quality at this size outside of museums (and even within non-current).
NOT LIKE THIS MODEL
Et in Arcadia ego ... As you see I'm not a treaty of modesty, we see the dark side.
The helmet is not up to the model I think is clearly improved. It has a rib which leads to a small lump that breaks the smoothness of the hull, grave sin.
I do not like the transition lines to form the spur, I fear that these lines are not resolved in a perfect manner. Put another way, the line of the hull makes a strange oddities in the transition to the ram.
Although more than one model told me that he liked, I loathe the "checkerboard" in two tones has the tin. As I explained depend on the tin foil is placed on one side or another to take a different tone. This did not appreciate it and no difference in tone between the plates. I do not like.
Another aspect that detracts from the red hue of the hull. I do not like the tone you choose (I think it should be darker) and the general appearance of the paint finish, notice that a parcel is not master.
The elements of the command post poop not satisfy me, I seem somewhat old-scale and are likely to be refined, primarily the helm and the telegraph, it suffers the same defect aft barrel revolver.
I think should have been embossed decorative wrought with more finesse. Godoy said
As well in the main yard 8S was feeling short. And it's short, but that was a considered decision and sought a longer penis would more complex subsequent management of the ship and fire the size of the urn.
I have a real phobia to bases, it seems tedious and avoid it. I think the model is hampered by poverty of the base, seen in row boat in the 8S screamed best and highest pedestal.
I think I'm something both pro and con, but basically these are the features that draw my opinion on my model.
How To Make Watercolor Paper Stretcher
THE REOPENING OF POLOP
May 23 was the last entry in this blog. From then until the present day I decided to stop publishing. What were the reasons for this interruption? Various:
1 A first and primary reason was the overflow of work and time. Address work, family, daily life, making boat, read, attend forums and meet a step by step was very painful to also address a blog. Something had to leave and least interested me was the blog.
2 Another reason for temporary nature, the blog is a tool and need to know to be used:
· Complete the Klingon war was out of use more or less bellicose of the grandstand.
· Published in modelismonaval.com steps steps at a blistering pace (photos almost daily), had no double meaning here the same, with the work that entails.
• For the practical management of the 8S, nor does it seem adequate space since it is carried out in an effective forum where, on the other hand, reaches an audience much broader than you may have here. Therefore
blog was deprived of reasons "practice." Today this state of affairs remains unchanged, may change in the future, but does not look, today is peace, Joaquín continues its sponsorship, the forum in health, communication practical affairs of 8S is very fluid, etc.
However, the reasons we are less "practical" as well, I think were pretty well outlined in the initial message of this blog, are summarized in a form of expression for the forums is not the right place. A strictly personal point of view on aspects of this absorbing hobby. This remains valid even in private, has sued me over a model friend to check miss my opinion on some things that inevitably happen.
In recent weeks, oddly enough, have emerged a number of blogs, I think it's good and I am not mistaken if I say that this mine led the way followed closely by the Zapalobaco. Some even have done me the honor to include me among friends blogs. So I can blog allegedly caused the title of dean of the Foreman. I called attention to the big time span that has elapsed between the birth of this blog, the development of Zapalobaco worked and the blooming of new blogs, a very long time.
In short, I think I'll revisit this blog, you can always provide a personal views on many issues and not be perfectly clear what's going to evolve, have a voice is always good, so I reopen this road that I was eating the weed.
May 23 was the last entry in this blog. From then until the present day I decided to stop publishing. What were the reasons for this interruption? Various:
1 A first and primary reason was the overflow of work and time. Address work, family, daily life, making boat, read, attend forums and meet a step by step was very painful to also address a blog. Something had to leave and least interested me was the blog.
2 Another reason for temporary nature, the blog is a tool and need to know to be used:
· Complete the Klingon war was out of use more or less bellicose of the grandstand.
· Published in modelismonaval.com steps steps at a blistering pace (photos almost daily), had no double meaning here the same, with the work that entails.
• For the practical management of the 8S, nor does it seem adequate space since it is carried out in an effective forum where, on the other hand, reaches an audience much broader than you may have here. Therefore
blog was deprived of reasons "practice." Today this state of affairs remains unchanged, may change in the future, but does not look, today is peace, Joaquín continues its sponsorship, the forum in health, communication practical affairs of 8S is very fluid, etc.
However, the reasons we are less "practical" as well, I think were pretty well outlined in the initial message of this blog, are summarized in a form of expression for the forums is not the right place. A strictly personal point of view on aspects of this absorbing hobby. This remains valid even in private, has sued me over a model friend to check miss my opinion on some things that inevitably happen.
In recent weeks, oddly enough, have emerged a number of blogs, I think it's good and I am not mistaken if I say that this mine led the way followed closely by the Zapalobaco. Some even have done me the honor to include me among friends blogs. So I can blog allegedly caused the title of dean of the Foreman. I called attention to the big time span that has elapsed between the birth of this blog, the development of Zapalobaco worked and the blooming of new blogs, a very long time.
In short, I think I'll revisit this blog, you can always provide a personal views on many issues and not be perfectly clear what's going to evolve, have a voice is always good, so I reopen this road that I was eating the weed.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)